At a glance

Approach Typical hospital stay Published success Incision
Robotic ~2 days >95% 4 small ports
Laparoscopic 2 to 3 days ~90% 3 to 4 small ports
Open 7 to 10 days ~90 to 95% Flank incision
Laser endopyelotomy Overnight or day-case ~75% None (via urethra)

Success figures are drawn from peer-reviewed series cited on the outcomes page. Individual results depend on anatomy, whether a crossing vessel is present, and patient factors.

How the decision is made

Dr Kooner's default offer for an adult with a clearly obstructing UPJ and reasonable kidney function is robotic pyeloplasty. Laparoscopic reconstruction is reserved for selected anatomies in centres without robotic access. Open pyeloplasty is offered when previous surgery or anatomical considerations mean keyhole access would not be safe. Laser endopyelotomy is offered to patients with a shorter narrowing who prefer a retrograde approach, or who have had previous reconstruction that has narrowed again.

Factors weighed at the consultation include:

  • Length of the narrowing on CT urogram.
  • Presence of a crossing vessel (a relative indication for reconstruction rather than endopyelotomy).
  • Split renal function on MAG3 - very low function on the affected side can shift the discussion towards observation or removal.
  • Prior abdominal surgery.
  • Anticoagulation and fitness for general anaesthetic.
  • Patient preference on incisions and recovery time.

Discuss your UPJ obstruction pathway

The rooms can arrange a consultation to review imaging, confirm obstruction with a drainage study, and outline which pyeloplasty approach fits your situation.